Amendments to Uganda’s constitution, particularly regarding presidential term limits, have sparked intense political debates and shaped public trust in governance.
Sign Up to CordQA.com, the questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to CordQA the questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Amendments to Uganda’s constitution, particularly regarding presidential term limits, have sparked intense political debates and shaped public trust in governance.
Uganda’s constitutional history reflects the country’s political evolution and struggles with governance, democracy, and leadership continuity. The current 1995 Constitution of Uganda is a culmination of years of political transitions, civil strife, and demands for democratic reforms. However, its handling of term limits has been a subject of significant debate and controversy.
Uganda’s constitutional evolution demonstrates the country’s journey toward democracy and the challenges of balancing leadership continuity with democratic principles. While the 1995 Constitution initially set term limits to promote good governance, subsequent amendments have raised concerns about political entrenchment. Restoring and upholding constitutional principles, including term limits, remains essential for Uganda’s democratic future.